Research American and co-author College of Gastroenterology President Douglas K.

Is usually available for interviews. Results of a fresh multicenter study by Cotton et al. Released today in the Journal of the American Medical Association evaluating standard colonoscopy with CT colonography for the detection of colorectal tumor reveal that technology, in the proper execution used most in the usa often, while of significant interest, isn’t a viable choice for routine colorectal cancers screening presently. The analysis utilized abdominal-pelvic CT scanning and the radiologists relied primarily on 2-dimensional pictures but 3-dimensional ‘fly-throughs’ of the colon that simulate standard colonoscopy had been also evaluated Related StoriesStudy shows vitamin D, supplements fail to drive back colorectal cancerResearchers find method to screen bloodstream samples to detect existence of precancerous polyps in the colonMayo Clinic cancer experts find gaps in current colorectal cancer tumor screening approachesThe study found that the sensitivity of CT colonography for detecting individuals with 1 or more lesions sized at least 6 mm was 39 %, and for lesions sized at least 10 mm it was 55 %, this weighed against 99 % and 100 % respectively when examined using standard colonoscopy generally known as complete colonoscopy.Nevertheless, John McDougall, MD, an internist, nutrition expert and medical director of the McDougall Program in Santa Rosa, California, cited a July 2010 research in the British Medical Journal to aid the fact that he does not prescribe calcium health supplements, because they increase the risk of heart episodes and strokes. Certainly, acquiring isolated concentrated minerals, such as for example calcium, produces physiological imbalances in the physical body, McDougall stated in a commentary regarding the July study.